Grounds for Trademark Opposition
Trademark

Grounds for Cancellation of Trademark

6 Mins read

Cancellation of intellectual property (IP) is the legal process of revoking or eliminating the rights that are granted to an owner in relation to their intellectual works, such as trademarks, patents, copyrights, or designs.

Though intellectual property rights offer exclusive protection to encourage innovation, creativity, and brand awareness, such rights are not absolute or irreversible under all circumstances. These rights can be challenged and revoked by the concerned authorities or courts if they are obtained through deception, fraud, a lack of originality, non-use, or if they go against the public interest.

Cancellation is also of immense importance in ensuring equity in the system by preventing abuse or unfair monopolies and ensuring healthy competition within the market. Cancellation also creates equilibrium between private rights and public interest by protecting only genuine, unique, and lawfully governed intellectual property. Cancellation thus serves as a corrective device within the intellectual property system, ensuring its integrity and guaranteeing its intended operation.

What is Trademark?

A distinctive sign, word, symbol, design, logo, phrase, shape, or combination of these components separates a company’s goods or services from those of others by use of a trademark. An indication of origin assures consumers that the product or service has a certain standard of quality from a certain source. Legally protected under trademark law, a trademark is a type of intellectual property that provides the owner sole-channel rights to use it in connection with registered goods or services.

The main function of a trademark is to avoid market confusion. Customers will rapidly associate a well-known brand logo with quality, reputation, and confidence, for instance. It improves brand awareness and loyalty, two of which are essential for business expansion. In marketing and brand-building campaigns, trademarks are absolutely essential as they help to distinguish one company from the others.

Main characteristics of a trademark:

  1. Distinctiveness: The brand has to distinguish its products or services from those of others.
  2. Registration gives the owner exclusive rights and legal recourse should a violation take place.
  3. Though intangible assets, intellectual property rights can be sold, franchised, licensed, or assessed in money.
  4. Knowing the source of products or services helps customers recognise and trust a brand, hence supporting the Source Identifier.
  5. Trademark typically every ten years, it may be periodically renewed eternally.
  6. Considering their distinctiveness, trademarks could include names, logos, slogans, forms, colours, noises, or even packaging design.

In other words, a trademark protects a company’s goodwill and lets consumers make educated decisions as it stands for the very heart of its brand in the market.

Grounds for Cancellation of Trademark

Cancellation, or revocation, removal, or declaration of invalidity/rectification, according to the law in force, relates to the removal of part or all of the protection that results from a registration. It can be either from the date of filing for registration (invalidity) or from a date later than the filing date (revocation or removal).

1. Abandonment/non-use

Meaning: Where the owner fails to use the registered mark in good faith for the goods/services for a prescribed continuous period, a third party can apply for revocation on the grounds of non-use. Many jurisdictions treat non-usage as a main ground for revocation.

Standard timeframes and laws:

  • In the EU/EUTM, there may be an application for revocation for non-use in cases where the mark has been registered for more than five years. The claimant must show evidence of actual non-use within this five-year period (subject to exceptions).
  • In India, Section 47 (and connected provisions) provides for the cancellation of a trademark if it has not been bona fide used during a period of five years (the method of calculation and the beginning/termination dates are technical and could be the subject of legal arguments). Courts require unequivocal evidence of abandonment.

Evidence needed:

  • Wholesaler/retailer invoices, distribution records, advertising materials, sales invoices, online listings, screenshots, affidavits, tax returns, and customs documentation.
  • The challenger must demonstrate non-use; however, the owner can rebut with evidence of actual use or valid reasons for temporary non-use.

2. Genericness or “genericide” (the mark becomes the common name)

What it is: If a brand name becomes the generic name for a product class (e.g., escalator, aspirin), it loses its trademark protection and can be cancelled. This is known as genericide.

Tribunals rely on consumer perception evidence (surveys), dictionary definitions, media usage, competitor use, and use of the mark as a product name rather than a brand. Protection is defeated if the public identifies the term with the category of product.

3. Failure to be distinctive, descriptive, or essentially generic terms

What it is: A mark that is only descriptive of the goods/services (e.g., “Cold Ice” for ice cream) or lacks distinguishing features might be invalid per se (absolute ground). Some descriptive marks might survive if they have obtained secondary meaning (distinctness by use).

Effect: Where a court holds that the mark is inherently not distinctive or is only descriptive but has not gained distinctiveness, the registration could be held to be unlawful.

4. False or misleading marks

A mark capable of leading the public into error as to the nature, quality, geographic origin, or other characteristics of goods/services can be ordered cancelled. For example, a mark that falsely describes a product as being from a particular place or person.

5. Inconsistency with prior rights/chance of confusion

What it is: A registration can be revoked if it contradicts an earlier trademark or other rights (names, company names, geographical indications, well-known marks) so that use of the registered mark would cause confusion. Many systems contrast absolute grounds (distinctiveness, descriptiveness) and relative grounds (earlier rights).

How it is determined: the similarity of the marks, the relatedness of goods/services, channels of trade, proof of actual confusion, and the distinctiveness of the prior mark.

6. Fraud, false statements, and bad faith in seeking registration

Courts and tribunals may cancel a registration if it was obtained by intentional falsehoods, omission, or misstatement, i.e., the representation of the use of a mark which does not exist. Establishing fraud is difficult since it requires establishing an intent to defraud and clear and convincing proof.

7. Marks contrary to law or public policy, such as protected symbols and insignia

What are the implications? Enrolments featuring national flags, state emblems, specific religious symbols, or marks considered offensive to public order, morals, or unlawful may be refused or cancelled. Many national legislations clearly define such unlawful signs.

8. Proprietor not entitled / wrong entry in the register / clerical errors

What does this imply? When the registered owner is not the actual proprietor (for example, when the mark was assigned without legitimate registration or where registration was erroneously effected in some other person’s name), a concerned party can ask the register to be corrected or cancelled. Legislation usually provides for correction where entries are in error.

9. Further specific grounds (examples)

Use of another person’s living name without his consent. Purely functional shapes that contribute greatly to the value of the products can be rejected or invalidated.

Who can apply, how is the process done, and what are the available remedies?

  1. Eligibility to apply: “any aggrieved person” (including competitors and former right-holders), national IP Offices (in some cases), or the public under certain regulations. Any person may file a cancellation petition pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1064 if he believes that he will be harmed.
  2. Remedies available include revocation or cancellation of registration (from the date of registration in the case of invalidity, or subsequently for revocation on grounds of non-use), partial cancellation (confined to specific classes of goods), or correction of the register. The processes, costs, and deadlines depend on the country (e.g., India under TM)
  3. Rules with forms and fees; deadlines for filing specific claims. Local laws and rules should be consulted. Usual evidence and load of proof. The other party has to support their claims (e.g., non-use, prior rights, common practice).
  4. Acceptable proof might include seller listings, consumer surveys, expert reports, statutory declarations, and customs documents, together with invoices, bank statements, and advertisements. include showing actual use, developed uniqueness, defensible non-use (owing to particular conditions), license or assignment paperwork, or permission and coexistence agreements. The trademark law holds that a trademark becomes incontestable after five years (though even incontestable registrations can be challenged on a limited basis, e.g., fraud).

Conclusion

Cancellation of trademarks is an important protection to make sure only genuine, distinctive, and legally established marks exist in the register. It prevents businesses from seeking rights over marks that are misleading, dishonest, ubiquitous, unused, or acquired in bad faith. This system lets legitimate businesses and customers be protected by raising challenges on grounds of non-use, loss of distinctiveness, conflict with previously granted rights, fraud, or public policy infringement.

It reminds corporate entities of the need to aggressively use their trademarks, keep accurate records, and obey the legislation. It lets the public and rivals remove unjust monopolies or incorrect registrations that interfere with fair competition.

At last, trademark cancellation honours brand owners who create goodwill while making sure the trademark system supports fair competition, consumer trust, and market integrity. This fits the basic idea that trademarks should indicate origin rather than serve other purposes.

Related Services

293 posts

About author
I am a qualified Company Secretary with a Bachelors in Law as well as Commerce. With my 5 years of experience in Legal & Secretarial. Have a knack for reading, writing and telling stories. I am creative and I love cooking. Travel is my go-to for peace and happiness.
Articles
Related posts
Trademark

Government Fees for Trademark Registration in India

3 Mins read
Trademark

Trademark Class 36

4 Mins read
Trademark

Trademarking Your Brand in the Bearing Industry: A Guide for Bearing Manufacturers

4 Mins read