The Goods and Services Tax framework in India was designed to facilitate a single indirect tax regime, enabling the smooth flow of credit and uniform taxation throughout the country. However, because of the vastness of the law, frequent changes, and multiple business activities, disputes arising in GST are just about inevitable. The disputes that are arising under the GST may relate to classification, availability of input tax credit, valuation, place of supply, procedural issues, and claims of a refund of the unutilised input tax credit. These disputes can result in payment of interest and penalties, leading to prolonged litigation, causing a threat to business continuity and ensuring compliance. The dispute resolution mechanisms are incorporated under the GST framework to ensure fair, prompt and effective resolution of GST disputes, enhancing transparency, safeguarding the rights of taxpayers, fostering trust in the tax administration system, and facilitating ease of doing business in India.
GST Disputes
Conflicts in GST are those disputes arising because of the difference in opinions on the interpretation, calculation, or compliance matters emanating from the taxpayers and the authorities regarding GST laws. Unresolved disputes may result in show-cause notices, audits, investigations, appeals, and litigation. Such matters impact business cash flow negatively, increase the compliance burden, delay refunds, and complicate the business environment.
Key reasons include:
- Misclassification of goods and services leads to incorrect rates of tax.
- Issues of input tax credits, including denial of credit, blocked credits, discrepancies in GSTR-2A/2B, and excessive claims thereof.
- Valuation disputes: under-invoicing, transactions between related parties, discounts, and additional costs.
- Confusion about interstate and intrastate supply.
- Procedural non-compliance, covering late submission, incorrect returns, and absence of documentation or expired e-invoices.
- When documentation or eligibility issues create disputes about the disallowance of export/ITC refunds.
- Cases involving anti-profiteering, that is, failure to pass on the benefit of the reduced GST rates to the consumers.
- Results from audits or investigations that may reveal tax shortfalls or incorrect ITC claims.
- Legal uncertainty is created by the evolving nature of the law on GST, frequent changes, and ambiguous notifications.
Resolutions for GST Disputes
The GST regime has provided certain efficacious mechanisms for dispute resolution that are considered necessary in maintaining a fair and transparent tax regime.
1. Departmental Adjudication
This is the first tier at which GST authorities dispose of issues.
Key Highlights:
- Orders can be issued by a Deputy/Assistant Commissioner or above.
- It deals with tax-related matters regarding requests, interest, and penalty; the denial of ITC; and the rejection of refund claims.
- SCN is issued, which provides an opportunity for the taxpayer to make representations and appear before the said authority.
- A final adjudication order is passed based on the facts, law invoked, and submissions.
2. GST Appeal Mechanism
a. First Appeal – Appellate Authority:
- This is filed against the adjudication order.
- It has to be filed within 3 months–extendable by one month.
- For the impugned taxes, a pre-deposit of 10% is necessary.
b. Second Appeal – Appellate Tribunal:
- GSTAT-the proposed GST Appellate Tribunal-would be implemented in phases.
- It requires a pre-deposit of 20% of the disputed tax (over and above the previously required 10%).
- It deals with substantial questions of interpretation.
c. High Court:
- Writ petitions may be filed for legal questions or breaches of natural justice.
- These are not suitable for standard fact-based appeals.
d. Supreme Court:
- Final resort for major and substantial legal conflicts and questions of law.
3. Advance Ruling for Anti-Profiteering Issues
- This addresses the issue of price cuts once a GST rate is reduced.
- The DGAP investigates, and the NAA/ Central Authority decides.
- Other methods of redress might include penalties, interest, and/or refunds of excess profits to consumers or the government.
4. Advanced Ruling Mechanism
This process is used to avoid litigation before there is even a dispute.
The relevant authorities are:
- AAR (Authority for Advance Ruling) and
- AAAR (Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling).
Issues addressed:
- Representation of goods/services
- Applicability of notifications
- ITC eligibility
- Place of supply, tax liability, etc.
Limitations:
- Only applicants and jurisdictional officers are bound to follow the rulings.
- The National Advance Ruling Authority had to be set up because there were conflicting decisions of AARs in different states.
5. Revision and Rectification
Powers for revision, amendment, or correction of orders:
- Rectification of errors of a clerical and arithmetical nature within 6 months.
- The Commissioner may correct mistaken orders, with conditions.
- Review powers are available to both taxpayers and departments.
6. Settlement by Audit and Scrutiny
- The officers are empowered to issue notices subsequent to audits, scrutiny, or investigations.
- The taxpayer is given an opportunity to present the documents and explanations.
- In case the authority is satisfied, the matter is settled without litigation.
7. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Currently limited, yet progressing.
- The methods of resolving disputes include mediation, conciliation, and arbitration.
- Future legislative changes might improve the ADR processes under GST.
8. Payment and Voluntary Compliance Scheme
- Taxpayers can make a voluntary settlement of their dues.
- Pre-SCN: pay tax and interest without penalty.
- Post-SCN: pay tax, interest, and reduced penalty.
This scheme encourages early settlement to avoid prolonged litigation.
9. Dispute Resolution Committee (DRC)
- Facilitates the resolution of disputes involving small amounts.
- Relief is provided based on the specifics of the case and the behaviour exhibited.
- This process encourages a taxpayer-friendly and prompt resolution.
10. Writ Petitions & Judicial Review
These are filed in the High Court for:
- Breach of natural justice
- Unconstitutional provisions
- Arbitrary actions by authorities
- Immediate stay of coercive recovery
This is a discretionary remedy available when the appeal route provided by statute is insufficient.
Administrative Resolution
Administrative remedies are those non-judicial, administrative methods by which the issues of GST are sorted out without necessarily going into litigation before the courts or tribunals. The GST law provides for reducing litigation by establishing structured internal procedures, conducting proactive compliance reviews, and setting up arrangements to prevent disputes.
1. Departmental Adjudication
This is the principal administrative stage in dispute resolution.
Process:
- Issuing a show-cause notice (SCN) under the relevant provisions of Section 73 or 74 of the CGST Act.
- There are options for both written and personal hearings.
- Orders are issued by the designated officer.
- This includes tax, interest, and penalties, as well as related matters.
Role:
- Helps resolve departmental disputes without escalation.
- Encourages taxpayer participation and the presentation of evidence.
2. Administrative Review and Revision
Senior officials have the power to revisit and revise adjudication orders in case of any mistake. Key mechanisms:
- Section 161: Rectification of inaccuracies in the record.
- Section 108 gives the Commissioner revisional powers for incorrect orders.
- Internal supervisory checks are targeted at providing equal administrative justice.
- This would ensure decisions are precise and consistent; therefore, there is no court involvement.
3. Advanced Ruling System
Advance rulings are meant to prevent future disputes by providing clarity before the actual transaction occurs. Authorities under the GST:
- AAR (Authority for Advance Ruling) and
- AAAR (Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling)
The issues covered range from classification and taxability to eligibility of ITC and place of supply, among others.
4. Pre-Notification and Show-Cause Engagement
Before the issue of SCN, the officials can discuss with the taxpayers to clarify the issue. Other administrative options include:
- Advisory notices
- Consultations before the show cause
- Departmental correspondence as a means of conciliation.
Outcome:
- Many issues are resolved prior to formal litigation occurring.
- The process encourages collaborative tax compliance.
5. Voluntary Payment and Self-Assessment Settlement
The concept behind the GST framework is to resolve conflicts amicably, avoiding a situation where conflicts escalate. Key Points:
- A payment made before SCN attracts only interest, no penalty (Section 73).
- A payment after SCN and before the order attracts a reduced penalty.
- Self-admitted liabilities are settled by way of the DRC-03 form.
The goal is to reduce disputes through voluntary compliance.
6. Resolution of Audit, Scrutiny, and Investigation
Administrative audits and inspections have been undertaken to identify effective resolution of disputes. Pathway:
- A notice is issued for explanation/reconciliation.
- The taxpayer files the clarifications/documents.
- The issues are closed if the officer is satisfied.
Results:
- Many disputes are resolved at the scrutiny stage.
- This process avoids legal escalation.
7. Dispute Resolution Committee
The DRC was established to manage small GST disputes. Functions:
- Analyse taxpayer behaviour and the nature of cases.
- Offer appropriate settlement options.
- Reduce litigation and promote taxpayer-friendly resolutions.
This committee applies to minor and procedural conflicts.
8. Administrative Circulars & Clarifications
Interpretational disputes are mitigated by way of circulars and FAQs issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.
9. Internal Consultations & Dispute Management Committees
GST advisory mechanisms within the department are as follows:
- Legal nodal officers
- Dispute management cells
- Internal review committees for appeal decisions.
These structures ensure consistency and help to minimise unnecessary litigation.
10. Anti-Profiteering & Market Investigation Proceedings
Disputes arising from the non-passing of GST price benefits to consumers. Administrative bodies:
- DGAP investigation
- NAA/CGST Authority conclusion (transitioning to CCI)
These administratively settle profiteering disputes before any judicial challenge.
Conclusion
The resolution of disputes effectively within the GST framework is of great importance in maintaining confidence in India’s indirect tax system and encouraging compliance. GST law provides an exhaustive mechanism that includes departmental adjudication, appellate remedies, advance ruling systems, clarification by way of circulars, and voluntary settlement to resolve grievances at various stages. These mechanisms are aimed at reconciling government revenue needs with the rights of the taxpayers, enhancing transparency, and minimising prolonged litigation. With the gradual implementation of the GST Appellate Tribunal and an increasing dependence on technology-driven oversight, a quicker and more efficient resolution of disputes can be expected.
Related Services
