Methods of Valuation of Shares in Corporate Accounting
Accounting & Bookkeeping

Methods of Valuation of Shares in Corporate Accounting

6 Mins read

Corporate accounting is a specialised field of accounting focused on recording, analysing, and reporting the financial transactions of companies registered under corporate law. It goes beyond just keeping books to ensure compliance with legislative requirements, the production of statutory books of accounts, and assurances of transparency for interested parties, including shareholders, creditors, investors, and governments. Corporate accounting covers the creation of consolidated accounts, valuation of goodwill, mergers and acquisitions of businesses, issuance and redemption of debentures and shares. It encourages businesses to maintain proper financial records and documents, provide a true and fair reflection of their financial situation, and present the required legal documents. Moreover, corporate accounting improves investor confidence and trust, helps management make decisions, and enhances corporate governance and responsibility.

What is the Valuation of Shares?

Shares are assessed to determine the fair economic worth of ownership interest or equity in a company. Based on financial performance, the approach involves assessing the value of one share or the total equity of a company over a certain period. market conditions, assets, and future prospects. The value of share valuation is that it offers a benchmark against which judgments in several circumstances, including mergers and acquisitions, buybacks, taxation, and succession, need to be measured. Preparation, conflict resolution, and investment analysis are produced.

The valuation process uses qualitative and quantitative data. Income-based, market-based, and asset-based, among many others, are widely used, such as the Net Asset Value (NAV). Every one of these approaches fits the degree and level of company expansion, stability, and value goals.

Share valuation is indeed an expert opinion based on systematic analysis and assumptions, not an exact science. Private firms can suffer adjustments like discounts for lack of marketability or minority interests. Although market prices tend to establish values for publicly traded companies, intrinsic value also needs to be considered.

Finally, valuation of shares encourages equity, transparency, and due decision-making by enabling shareholders to understand the intrinsic value of their investment as well as regulatory, strategic, and financial compliance.

Methods of Valuation of Shares

Valuation of shares determines the economic value of a stock investment in a business. The method used is dependent on the length of time of the business, availability of data, purpose (like transactions, taxation, financial reporting, or resolution of disputes), and whether control or minority value is to be emphasised.

1. Cash flow-based approach based on discounted cash flow (DCF)

Present Value is the present value of future cash flows expected. Two common DCF methods are Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) and Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE).

Formulae:

  • FCFF-based: Enterprise Value =

∑(FCFF_t / (1+WACC)^t) + Terminal Value/(1+WACC)^n, Equity Value = Enterprise Value – Net Debt.

  • FCFE-based: Equity Value =

∑(FCFE_t / (1+ke)^t) + Terminal Value/(1+ke)^n.

Inputs include projections (such as revenues, margins, capital expenditure, and working capital), discount rates (WACC for FCFF; cost of equity for FCFE), and terminal growth or exit multiples.

This approach is appropriate for both established and growing firms with stable financial streams. Strengths are economic realism and tailoring to the unique requirements of companies. Weaknesses are sensitivity to projections, discount rates, and terminal assumptions and the need for extensive modelling and normalisation of one-off items.

2. Dividend Discount Model (DDM)

  • Definition: Value is the present value of future dividends expected.
  • Formulae: Gordon Growth (single stage): P0 = D1/(ke-g). Multi-stage models are used to account for different growth phases.
  • This model applies to stable, dividend-paying firms (e.g., utilities and established banks).
  • Advantages: A simple dividend structure that has a high correlation with cash generation.
  • Disadvantages: Inapplicable to non-dividend-paying entities or those aiming to retain earnings for growth; vulnerable to fluctuations in growth and equity costs.

2. Relative (Market-based) Valuation — Multiples

  • Concept: Compare the target to similar listed companies or transactions using multiples: P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, EV/Sales. Value = Multiple × Relevant Metric.
  • Process: Select peer group, normalise metrics (remove one-offs), choose median/percentile multiple, apply to subject company.
  • When to apply: Where there are good comparables, rapid checks, and verification by DCF.
  • Advantages: Reflects the market, rapid, intuitive.
  • Disadvantages: It is difficult to get genuine comps; market emotion and accounting variations can skew multiples.

3. Asset-based valuation (Net Asset Value vs. Adjusted NAV)

  • Value is the fair value of assets minus liabilities. Versions consist of liquidation NAV, normalised NAV for current operations, and net tangible assets.
  • Utilisation in asset-intensive firms, holding companies, liquidation situations, and troubled companies.
  • Advantages: Handy with negative or erratic earnings, having a tangible bottom value.
  • Disadvantages: Fails to account for intangible value or future profitability, since it’s difficult to value intangibles and human capital.

4. Residual income (abnormal earnings) model

Value is determined by summing the book value of equity plus the present value of residual income (profits less the equity charge) for the future.

Formula:

Value = BV0 + Σ[(E_t – ke × BV_{t-1}) / (1+ke)^t].

  • Suit companies with high book values (eg banks, insurance) and unstable dividends/cash flows.
  • Advantages are that it fills the gap between accounting and market measurements and resolves short-term anomalies.
  • Disadvantages: As with any predictions of book value and profits, the quality must be good.

5. Option-based and real options techniques

  • Option prices (Black-Scholes, binomial) may apply to the valuation of contingent rights such as warrants, staged investment, and strategic real options (e.g., expansion, abandonment).
  • When: Startups with staged investment, projects with managerial flexibility, and highly complex capital structures.
  • Advantages: Is able to pick up managerial flexibility and asymmetry in payoffs.
  • Disadvantages include the requirement of volatility estimates and sophisticated modelling, and the potential for subjective inputs.

6. Transaction, Precedent, and Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP)

  • Apply multiples from similar M&A transactions to account for control premia and synergies.
  • Apply appropriate methods to value the separate segments of each company and sum them up to determine the group value (SOTP).
  • Apply price scenarios for conglomerates, divestitures, or acquisitions and mergers.
  • Advantages: Accurate transaction evidence and flexibility.
  • Disadvantages: Limited data on transactions and the need to make adjustments for control and minority ownership.

Important and practical factors to consider

  1. Determine if a control premium or minority discount is to be applied for valuation.
  2. In matters of private or restricted stock, use a discount for lack of marketability (DLOM).
  3. For the calculation of non-operating items, add more cash and investments, and deduct debt and non-core liabilities.
  4. Realise adjustments for one-off events, owner compensation, and cyclical fluctuations.
  5. Use discount rates to calculate the cost of equity (CAPM = Rf + β×ERP) and WACC (adjusting for post-tax debt and equity ratios). Beta should be leveraged or deleveraged as needed.
  6. In order to ascertain the terminal value, use conservative long-term growth (≤ nominal GDP) or market multiples and perform sensitivity testing.

How to Choose the Most Suitable Method for Valuation of Shares?

Choosing the most appropriate valuation method involves matching the method with the nature of the company, the intent of valuation, and data availability. The following is a methodical guide to identifying the best strategy

1. Identify the purpose and governing law.

  • Use transaction/precedent multiples and DCF for mergers and acquisitions or sales (including control premiums).
  • Use prescribed techniques or consult a professional when completing taxes or statutory reports.
  • Use different techniques to derive a defensible range for the purpose of litigation.

2. Evaluate the lifecycle and cash flow transparency of the company.

  • For mature, stable firms, use the DCF or Dividend Discount Model (with constant dividends assumed).
  • Emerging-stage ventures can use option-based (real options), venture capital approaches, or revenue multiples.
  • Alternative valuations for distressed or negative profitability are asset-based (NAV) or liquidation methods.

3. Verify data and availability of comparables.

  • Relative multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA) are viable and market reflective when reliable listed peers or transactions are available.
  • Apply DCF or asset-based approaches if comparables are not available.

4. Consider asset intensity and intangible assets.

  • Adjusted NAV is appropriate for holding or asset-intensive companies.
  • For intangible-rich firms (e.g., intellectual property, brand), use DCF with cautious forecasting and add a premium for special strengths.

5. Examine dividend and payout policies.

  • Regular dividend payers make DDM applicable.
  • DDM is not suitable in the absence of any dividends.

6. Control, liquidity, and marketability.

  • Offer control premiums or minority discounts depending on the situation.
  • For private shares, consider DLOM (discount for lack of marketability).

7. Examine capital structure and complexity.

  • Price options and capitalization tables for complex capital structures like warrants or staged funding.

8. Consider real-world constraints such as time, cost, and expertise.

  • Use multiples for fast estimates and DCF for complete, defensible valuations, depending upon available resources.

9. Best practice: triangulate and stress-test

  • Run 2–3 appropriate methods, present a valuation range, weight methods based on relevance, and perform sensitivity analysis.
  • Document peer selection, discount rates, growth rates, adjustments, and assumptions.

Finally – Select methods that are compatible with purpose, quality of data, and firm profile; always triangulate outcomes, justify weights, and disclose main assumptions for a solid, defensible valuation.

Conclusion

Various approaches, like the income-based, market-based and asset-based, provide different types of insights depending on the company’s type, maturity, and valuation purpose. Since a single approach may not be suitable for every circumstance, it is possible to employ two or more methods in combination or triangulation to provide the best possible results. A well-thought-out share valuation fosters transparency, facilitates strategic decision-making, instils investor confidence, and provides the basis for fair corporate and financial transactions.

Related Services

334 posts

About author
I am a qualified Company Secretary with a Bachelors in Law as well as Commerce. With my 5 years of experience in Legal & Secretarial. Have a knack for reading, writing and telling stories. I am creative and I love cooking. Travel is my go-to for peace and happiness.
Articles
Related posts
Accounting & Bookkeeping

Top 10 Accounting Challenges and Effective Solutions for Businesses

6 Mins read
Accounting & Bookkeeping

What is an Injection in Accounting?

4 Mins read
Accounting & Bookkeeping

AS-5 Accounting Standard

6 Mins read