One of the best foundations of GST is the Input Tax Credit (ITC), which aims to avoid cascading tax and ensure the smooth flow of credit. Nevertheless, the early years of GST saw fraudulent claims and false invoices as major problems. To curb this, the Finance Act, 2021, has added Section 16(2)(aa), under which ITC can be claimed only when the supplier has provided invoice information in GSTR-1, and the same is reflected in GSTR-2A or GSTR-2B to the recipient.
This amendment transformed the entire compliance ecosystem, as ITC was limited to automatically generated statements. This blog explains, in a simplified manner, the motivation behind Section 16(2)(aa), what it means, how it affects, and the legal clarity of the law, as well as why the ITC cannot be availed after GSTR-2A/2B.
Understanding Section 16(2)(aa)
The provisions of Section 16(2) (aa) are to the effect that a registered person would qualify to claim ITC only when the supplier has provided the details of the invoice or debit note in their GSTR-1 and communicated the same to the recipient in GSTR-2A or GSTR-2B.
It implies that ITC can no longer rely solely on possession of invoices or on payment to the supplier. Eligibility is now directly dependent on the supplier’s compliance. Failure by the supplier to upload the invoice does not mean the ITC does not exist; it can still be claimed.
Simplified Meaning:
If an invoice is not reported in either GSTR-2A or GSTR-2B, the taxpayer is not allowed to claim ITC, even if the invoice is valid and payment has been received.
Why was Section 16(2) (aa) introduced?
- Controlling Fake ITC: Prior to this provision, numerous entities were purporting ITC on invoices that suppliers never uploaded or, in some cases, never existed. These were fraudulent activities that led to a leakage of revenue. This new rule ensures that supplier declarations match credit claims.
- Strengthening Compliance: The rule motivates suppliers to submit GSTR-1 within the stipulated time. As soon as buyers begin exerting pressure on suppliers to apply correctly, the general compliance increases automatically.
- Bringing Transparency: Section 16(2)(aa) clarifies that credit is only associated with system-generated data. This will provide a transparent chain of credit and reduce disputes between taxpayers and GST departments.
GSTR-2A Vs GSTR-2B: Differences
- GSTR-2A: The GSTR-2A is a dynamic report, which gets updated each time a supplier makes or amends the GSTR-1. It displays the real-time location of uploaded invoices.
- GSTR-2B: GSTR-2B is static. As soon as it is created, it does not vary within a month. It provides the ultimate ITC for that tax period. GSTR-2B is more reliable for compliance checks and departmental audits.
Which One Matters for Section 16(2)(aa)?
Although both are specified in the law, in practice, GSTR-2B is considered the final word in determining ITC eligibility.
ITC Claiming and the Implication of Section 16(2)(aa)
- Strict Matching Needed: Businesses should ensure their purchase register aligns with GSTR-2B. Any incompatibility will cause a temporary loss of ITC.
- No ITC on Missing Invoices: Previously, a temporary ITC of 5 percent was permitted on invoices that are not included in the GSTR-2A/2B. This advantage has been eliminated after Section 16(2) (aa). Reflective invoices are the ones that are eligible for ITC.
- Restriction on Provisional ITC: The ITC of a buyer is subject to the presence of well-timed uploading of invoices by the supplier. ITC is blocked even in circumstances where the seller has made the correct filing, but the buyer has paid tax.
Practical Situations Where ITC Cannot be Availed
- Invoice Not Received by Supplier: The supplier will not be reported in your 2A/2B, and ITC will not be eligible if the supplier does not report an invoice in GSTR-1.
- Supplier Filed GSTR-1 Late: When one of the suppliers is late, then the invoice will show in the 2B next month. ITC should only be asserted in a later month, but not sooner.
- Wrong GSTIN or Incorrect Entry: Any slight mistake in the GSTIN will not allow the invoice to appear. The supplier is free to make corrections, and the ITC cannot be claimed.
Compliance Requirements for Business
- Monthly Reconciliation: Purchase records should be reconciled with GSTR-2B after every month. Delays also put excess ITC at risk of being accidentally claimed.
- Supplier Follow-Up: Companies must pursue non-compliant suppliers. Adherence can be ensured through regular reminders and contractual clauses.
- Document Maintenance: Companies should maintain records of invoices, payment receipts, and communications for review by departments.
- Reconciliation Tools Integration: Automated GST tools make it easier to match and identify mismatches, reducing the risk of human error.
Repercussions of Claiming ITC Beyond GSTR-2A/2B
- ITC Reversal with Interest: ITC availed wrongly is to be reversed, and with 18 per cent interest from the availing date.
- Penalties and Notices: The department can also make mismatch notices. Section 122 may also impose a penalty against wrongful ITC.
- Higher Scrutiny: Repeated mismatches or overclaims of ITC can be subjected to greater audit risk.
Conclusion
Section 16(2)(aa) has fundamentally altered businesses’ ITC claims. The GST system now operates in real-time matching, and ITC cannot be asserted beyond what runs on GSTR-2A or GSTR-2B. This makes it transparent, helps minimise tax fraud, and enhances suppliers’ accountability. For businesses, the keys to staying within the parameters of this new framework are monthly reconciliation, effective supplier management, and proper documentation.
Related Service
