Last Updated on December 29, 2025
Legal and commercial relationships are based upon contracts. Not all individuals are, however, legally in a position to sign a valid contract. Indian contract law has a clear definition of competence to contract and, at the same time, incompetence. Individuals under legal incapacity have no lawful right to enter into legally binding contracts, and the contract signed with individuals with a legal incapacity may be invalid or repudiable.
The article describes the incompetency to contract under the Indian law, the legal causes of incompetency and the impacts of forming an agreement with an incompetent person.
Introduction
Normal day activities like an employment contract, a property purchase, a loan, or a service contract are all based on the simple premise that the parties involved are legally competent to form a contract. The Indian Contract Act, 1872, provides certain guidelines to be followed to decide whether a particular individual is eligible to enter into a contract.
The incompetency to contract is a concept that is used to safeguard helpless persons and provide fairness in contracting transactions. The agreement signed by an individual who has no legal capacity is not subject to enforcement, no matter how serious the intention of the parties is. It is thus very important to understand who is incompetent to contract in order to enable individuals, businesses and even legal professionals.
Legal Requirement Claiming Competency to Contract
Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act,1872 stipulates the competency to contract. By this provision, any individual is competent to contract who:
- has reached the age of majority,
- is of sound mind, and
- is not subject to any law to disqualification to contract.
Any individual who fails to meet these requirements is deemed incompetent in contracting.
Types of Incompetent Persons to Contract
Indian law widely identifies three types of persons who are incapable of contracting.
1. Minors
A minor refers to an individual who is not of the majority age. In India, the legal age of majority is mostly 18 years. The age of majority, however, is 21 years in case of the appointment of a guardian or a court of wards.
Indian law makes the minor totally incompetent in contract. The contract that is concluded with a minor is void ab initio, which means void since the very beginning. The case of Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose was the landmark case which entrenched this principle.
No minor can be made liable on breach of contract, nor can a contract be enforced against him. Nevertheless, this law does not deny the minors protection in certain ways but instead provides a certain degree of protection by permitting minors to receive essential things provided to them, like food, clothing, schooling, or treatment, out of their property.
2. Persons of Unsound Mind
An insane person cannot enter into a contract. The legislation does not automatically disenfranchise all mentally ill individuals. Rather, the test is whether the individual can comprehend the contract and make a rational decision relating to the impacts of the contract when entering into the contract.
Others who are considered to be of unsound mind can be people who are mentally ill, insane or those with a very low intellectual capability. The temporary states like drunkenness or a serious illness can also make a person unable to contract in case they make the understanding unable at the appropriate moment.
The contract can be valid provided that an individual who is otherwise of unsound mind concludes a contract in a lucid period. On the other hand, an individual who is not mentally ill is not capable of concluding a valid contract at a time when he is mentally incapacitated.
3. Persons Disqualified by Law
Certain laws in place declare certain persons incompetent to contract. This exclusion is not based on age or mental ability but rather on the legal limitations through the public interest.
Incidentally, insolvents are also limited to the operations of their property. An insolvent is not prohibited from making personal contracts, but cannot make contracts involving his or her property unless the insolvency court gives him or her permission.
Equally, foreign persons of sovereignty, alien wartime foes and diplomatic agents might be restricted in contracting under international legal principles or national security.
In other instances, statutory bodies or corporations can only make contracts to this extent and no further as permitted by law. Any contract outside such power is voided.
Impact of contracts made by incompetent individuals
The contracts made by incompetent persons are usually ineffective and not valid. This implies that no legal rights and liabilities are developed based on such agreements.
The law, however, has some exceptions to avoid injustice. As an illustration, in cases where an individual provides necessities to a minor or an individual of unsound mind, he or she can claim reimbursement, but not on the personal liability of the property of the individual.
Another trend followed by the courts is to protect incompetent persons by tracing unfair or misleading contracts.
The Reason why the Law Deems some individuals Incompetent
Protection is the main aim of the declaration of some persons incompetent to contract. Minors and individuals who are of unsound mind might not have the maturity or appreciation to determine the risks of a contract.
The existence of legal disqualification helps to eliminate exploitation and injustice and provides some degree of certainty in contract relations. It also promotes the due diligence exercised by the parties before they enter into agreements.
Implications for Businesses and Individuals
Before contracting, businesses and individuals should ensure that the other party has the legal capability to engage in a contract. Contracts with people who lack competence can result in loss of money, court battles, or obligations that cannot be enforced.
Appropriate paperwork, authentication of identity and legal scrutiny reduce the chances of invalid contracts.
Conclusion
Incompetency to contract is another concept of the Indian contract law. The minors, persons of unsound mind and persons who are disqualified by law cannot legally bind themselves to valid contracts. Any contract concluded with such individuals is not only invalid but also liable to the harsh law. Knowledge of these rules not only provides an edge over legal non-compliance but also enhances fair and responsible contracting practices. When getting into a contract, it is important to ensure that one is legally fit to enter into a contract with the other parties.
Related Services
