In India, the process relating to appeals is regulated by the CPC under the civil procedure code. It is an act that relates to civil courts. An appeal offers a way through which a higher court can consider and review the actions of a lower court. The CPC sets out circumstances under which an appeal may be lodged and that it must be on grounds of law or fact and /or irregularity. This article discusses and illustrates the grounds of appeal under the CPC with an accompaniment of sections of the CPC that might be useful in this process.
Appeals under CPC
Appeals remain an indispensable element of the functioning of justice as citizens can seek to change a negative outcome and gain a new trial, correct obvious injustices, and attain legal harmonization. To provide a structure to appeals, the CPC (1908) is mainly outlined primarily under sections 96 to 112. A matter can be appealed against such decisions as judgments, decrees and orders made by a lower court, depending on the nature of the case. However, the appeal is not a repetitive right in all matters; it is done as per CPC stipulated grounds.
Key Sections Relating to Appeals Under the CPC
- Section 96: This section addresses the possibility of appealing any decree issued by a lower court to a higher court. It outlines when an appeal is permissible and the conditions under which it can be made.
- Section 100: This section deals with appeals in second appeals and captures the manner in which a second appeal can be made, generally on questions of law.
- Section 101 to 112: These sections create mechanisms through which an appeal can be filed, the time when such an appeal has to be filed, how such an appeal needs to be tendered, and the authority of the appellate court.
In general, appeal can be lodged against any final or interlocutory order or decree passed by the lower court so long as such an appeal is lodged within the time frame envisaged under the CPC. The grounds for appeal must generally have to do with some error by the lower court judgment, order or decree.
Grounds of Appeal Under the CPC
1. Error in Law (Section 96)
An average appellant often cites the lower court’s mistake of law as one of the most frequent reasons to appeal. This may include instances where the court:
- Misinterprets or misapplies legal provisions: The appellant submit that more particularly the lower court have applied wrong or rather means wrong legal concepts to the facts of the case.
- Fails to consider binding precedent: Where the lower court failed or ignored a higher court decision or simply a legal precedent, a motion can be made on grounds of law-error.
2. Error in Fact (Section 96 and Section 100)
Another reason for an appeal is the lower court’s error in the factual misinterpretation of evidence:
- The court has misunderstood the evidence or overlooked crucial evidence.
- The court has made incorrect factual inferences based on the evidence before it.
Whereas Section 96 pertains to appeals whereby decrees were arrived at as the result of misuse of any fact, Section 100 is appropriate in connection with second appeals, which can only be made on some substantial question of law. At the same time, in reaching its result, a higher court may also take these mistakes as at least implicating an error in fact into account.
3. Manifest Injustice (Section 96 and Section 100)
The appeal can also be based on the principle that the decision of the lower court has occasioned a miscarriage of justice. In such cases, the appellant argues that:
- The lower court’s decision was unreasonable, arbitrary, or oppressive.
- The judgment does not reflect the principles of natural justice.
- The judgment is contrary to public policy or good conscience.
Manifest injustice is usually contemplated when there is an impression of unfairness or that justice is seen to be done.
4. Misapplication of Judicial Discretion (Section 96)
Jury discretion in this context may be understood as the jury’s ability to come to a certain decision on a certain matter in the course of the case, taking into account the facts and positions. However, that is not so: if a lower court has adulterated its discretion in some manner, then that would create grounds for appeal. Common examples include:
- Failing to do so with proper cause, granting or denying an injunction.
- Granting unjust or unjustifiably high or low compensations for tort, breach of contract, etc.
Misapplication appeals mostly challenge the manner in which the lower court used its discretion, arguing that the exercise of discretion was unreasonable or was done in violation of the legal principles.
5. Non-Compliance with Procedural Law (Section 96)
It also ensures that procedural law in the CPC is followed to ensure that all civil cases are conducted in a conventional manner without infringing any procedural law. An appeal can be filed on reasons to the effect that the lower court did not follow the right procedure in giving its judgment or order. Common procedural errors include:
- Failure to issue proper notice to the opposing party.
- Improper admission or rejection of evidence.
- Failure to allow an opportunity for the party to be heard.
Where procedural irregularities are qualitatively such that they may influence the fairness of the trial or decision of the case, an appeal can be made under Section 96 for the lower court’s decision to be set aside as being tainted by such irregularities.
6. Illegality or Lack of Jurisdiction (Sections 96, 100)
A decision by a trial or other lower court may also be appealed if the passing court does not have the jurisdiction to hear it. Jurisdictional errors can arise when:
- The court does not have territorial jurisdiction over the matter.
- The court is not vested with the subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the specific issue.
Section 96 similar to Section 100 enables appeal where it is argued that the lower court exceeded its powers. This is always a good ground for appeal since any order or decree made without jurisdiction is avoid.
7. Unreasoned or Perverse Judgment (Section 96)
Another ground that an appellant can argue is that the judgment of the lower court is unreasonable or perverse. A judgment is considered perverse when:
- The findings of the court are not supported by the evidence.
If the lower court judgment is arbitrary or no reasons have been given, the higher court may step in to correct this error.
8. Incorrect Application of Precedent (Section 96, Section 100)
In Section 96, an appeal may be founded on such decisions being given incorrectly, and in Section 100, the same applies. The appellant may want to claim that the lower court did not properly consider legal precedents, leading to a wrong or unfair judgment.
This ground is important because the Judiciary should have a stable and consistent interpretation of the provision of law for it to be considered a rule-based system. If the court does not follow precedents, chaos may follow, or injustice occurs that requires an appeal to return the legal system to normalcy.
Procedural Requirements for Filing an Appeal
- Time Limits: According to Section 96 it states that appeals must be presented with a specified time limit, usually 30 days from the date of the decree or order to be appealed.
- Memorandum of Appeal: Order XLI Rule 1 CPC lays the provisions for the appellant to file a memorandum in the appellate court stating the grounds of appeal and the relief that the appellant seeks.
- Payment of Court Fees: Taxes depend on the fee scale normally payable at the time of entering the appeal before the court of law.
- Preparation of Records: The appellant need to submit to the appellate court such things as lower court judgment, evidence and any other document.
Conclusion
The grounds of appeal under the CPC are meant to give legal redress to people who were given a wrong or unfair decision. This means that, like the grounds as to why an appeal may be made, it provides an appellant with legal redress in the upper echelons of a judiciary system.
An appeal under the Civil Procedure Code may be on legal grounds such as a point of law, question of fact, question of mixed law and fact, apparent injustice, abuse of the process of the Court, neglect of the mandatory provisions of the law, want of jurisdiction, and wrongfulness of decision under the authority of the decisions of analogous cases. The procedural requirements in the CPC mean that the methods used to appeal are procedural and standardized. By following the above-stated grounds and procedures, parties can appeal against decisions of lower instance courts and seek remedies in order to regain justice without the issue of an altered compromised form.
Related Service
